According to the hypothesis, people have a strong desire or need to believe that the world is an orderly, predictable, and just place, where people get what they deserve. Quick Reference. The just-world fallacy or just-world hypothesis is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, to the end of all noble actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished. Just-world hypothesis, also known as just-world fallacy, is the belief that people get what they deserve since life is fair. The concept was developed in part to help explain observations that to preserve a belief that the world is a just place, people will sometimes devalue a victim. The just world hypothesis is the belief that moral behavior tends to be rewarded by the world, leading to positive consequences, while immoral behavior tends to be punished by the world, leading to negative consequences. Just World Hypothesis Research. The just-world hypothesis is a cognitive bias that causes people to assume that people’s actions always lead to fair consequences, meaning that those who do good are eventually rewarded, while those who do evil are eventually punished. In social psychology, just-world hypothesis is the term used for the unquestioned assumption that the world is a just place where the deserving are rewarded and the undeserving punished. Because people want to believe that the world is fair, they will look for ways to explain or rationalize away injustice, often blaming the person in a situation who is actually the victim. an attribution error; based on the assumption that bad things happen to bad people and good things happen to good people; jumping to conclusions than give full weight to the situational factors that may have been responsible. just world hypothesis. The Just World Fallacy (aka the Just World Hypothesis) is the assumption or belief that we get what we deserve, meaning that those of us who perform actions that are deemed good will be rewarded eventually, and that those of us who perform actions that are deemed bad will be punished eventually. The just-world phenomenon is the tendency to believe that the world is just and that people get what they deserve. It therefore follows that if people are punished they must have done something to deserve it, and this is how the hypothesis accounts for people who blame victims for their own misfortunes. Just-World Hypothesis. The most famous research studies conducted to examine the just world hypothesis have revealed some interesting behavior patterns among people who believe in a just world.

He and Carolyn Simmons created an experiment to test it. Obedience. In 1965, Melvin Lerner developed the Just World Hypothesis. The need to see victims as the recipients of their just deserts can be explained by what psychologists call the Just World Hypothesis. The just-world hypothesis is the belief that, in general, the social environment is fair, such that people get what they deserve. The widespread but false belief that the world is essentially fair, so that the good are rewarded and the bad punished. Psychology Definition of JUST-WORLD HYPOTHESIS,: It was postulated by Canadian psychologist Melvin J Lerner 1929 This is a cognitive bias since it suggests … Lerner And Simmons.